Musculoskeletal Disorders among Fourth- and Fifth-Year Clinical Dental Students at the Universidad de Panamá

Main Article Content

Raquel Villalobos de Cortés, Rita Teresa Espósito, Kira Singh, Luis H. Vega Tejada, Marcia Lorenzetti C., Luis Antonio Jaén

Abstract

Background: Dental clinical training requires sustained postures and repetitive precision movements that may contribute to musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) before professional practice begins.
Objective: To estimate MSD prevalence and characterize anatomical distribution, symptom duration and intensity, functional impact, orthopedic diagnostic groupings, perceived contributors, and differences by sex and clinical cycle among fourth- and fifth-year clinical dental students.
Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional census study was conducted at the Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Panamá, during the first academic semester of 2026. The Standardized Nordic Questionnaire was administered to eligible students, open-ended responses were categorized, and questionnaire findings were reviewed by an orthopedic specialist. Descriptive statistics, the chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test were used.
Results: Data from 78 students were analyzed; 64 (82.1%) were women. Overall, 77 students (98.7%) reported at least one musculoskeletal complaint. The dorsal/lumbar region (71.8%), neck (71.4%), and wrist/hand (59.0%) were most frequently affected. Wrist/hand (15.4%) and neck symptoms (14.3%) most often led to activity suspension. Cervical (50.0%), dorsal/lumbar (46.2%), and wrist disorders (35.9%) were the most frequent presumptive orthopedic groups. Dorsal/lumbar complaints differed by clinical cycle (χ² = 7.24; p = 0.027), whereas global MSD presence did not differ by sex (Fisher's exact p = 1.000). Poor posture, working position, or inadequate ergonomics was cited by 75.6% of students.
Conclusion: Musculoskeletal complaints were nearly universal in this census and showed a consistent cervical, dorsal/lumbar, and wrist/hand pattern. Because the cross-sectional design cannot establish causality, the findings support prospective ergonomic surveillance, direct observation of clinical posture, equipment adjustment, active-break protocols, and a formal referral pathway rather than claims that clinical training alone caused the disorders.

Article Details

Section
Articles